Monday, February 18, 2008

A Nice Way to Move About......(with fewer emmissions!)

Well, I didn't have this in mind, but I'd prefer this sight to a Hummer that burns a ton of oil every mile and takes 15 normal car lengths in my city!

I don't know how this would work in big congested cities, but I think it's a great idea, if it is taken seriously and the infrastructure is made to support such a change. I'm talking about bicycles for the urbanites! European cities have been trying this for a while already. London just announced that it will provide 6,000 free bikes for rent for a small fee so people could easily & efficiently move about their city. To encourage Londoners and visitors to the city to actually use the bikes, they have planned to first establish a series of bike lanes and bike paths that will easily link up many of London's most popular spots.

"The cycle hire scheme in Paris has proved a huge success, and I have now instructed Transport for London to work with the London boroughs and interested parties to develop and implement a bike hire scheme in central London, accessible to all Londoners," London mayor, Ken Livingstone said in a press release.

New York City mayor Mike Bloomberg is seriously looking into this as well. I hope it goes through, but knowing the city, some major changes need to take place to make this a safe alternative.

Now, here's another pet peeve of mine: unnecessary monsters on the road! What's up with those people who probably have some kind of a psychological complex to drive those humangous SUVs... I know, it's more of a statement that a utility. Those "Sport Utility Vehicles" also happen to give you very poor gas mileage. You know, that kind of a fossil fuel God put in the soil of countries that don't like us! The kind of fuel we spend fortunes at the pump and to maintain a military presence overseas to make sure we get it... Ah, also throw in the thousands of American soldiers' lives lost in the process of acquiring such fuel for those people who say they support our troops.

Those magnetic stickers many SUV owners have placed on their cars say, Support the Troops. OK, I often asked, what does such a statement mean? How does an American exactly support the soldiers fighting for our freedoms and lifestyle? There seems to me that it's not sacrifice at all if you say, I do so because I can afford it! Those magnetic ribbons do something for sure. They are an irritation, and they dmost likely support some guy in China who makes those plastic stickers.

I think people should pay a premium based on their impact on the environment and all the other resources, especially when certain behaviors & symbols are not of necessity but of showing off!

Again, Mr. Livingston has a bright idea: Drivers of 4x4s, high-powered sports cars, and other high-emission vehicles will have to pay $49 a day to enter central London! This is (only) tripple the current charge. But, wait, most governments would stop here, not this mayor. He said that fuel-efficient vehicles will get a free ride! Wow, now, that's a thought!

I thought I had finished this post until I read this Alternet article You've got to be kidding, and I got more infurated. General Motors calls this new trend (?) intelligent indulgence! I'm not making this up. GM is pushing hybrid monsters as a public relations move and to give some kind of a fig-leaf excuse to people to keep buying unnecessarily huge vehicles. I don't know how many people would buy into the idea that a innefficient & gas-guzzler car is OK because it's a hybrid... I'm all for better fuel-efficient standards but I believe this is ridiculous. From a 10 MPG to 13.5, or whatever little more it is, it still doesn't make any sense to me. All to drive from the supermarket to the movie theater to a few blocks around the house. By the way, 98% of the "off road vehicles" never leave the paved roads!

5 comments:

Geo2 said...

Click on the links for more information about the Paris and London bike programs.


I don't know where that picture is from, probably from some parade in some western city.

Anonymous said...

I'd love the idea of cheap bikes that can be rented for a few hours. Amsterdam has successfully done this. The sooner we do this in NYC the better.

But, like you said, there have to be some serious changes to make it safe.

Our government has had the wrong priorities and not a very smart way of looking & solving congestion problems.

Geo2 said...

I'm a proponent of very cheap (if not free) public transportation. It's a matter of priorities you see. If congestion takes a tool, in human health, time & productivity lost, and tons of aggravation, then just make it easy for people not to use cars.

In NYC the subways run at capacity during rush hours. That says something.

Anonymous said...

not to mention the impact on the environment!

Anonymous said...

I think there has to be a multi-facet solution to the problem of congestion, the environment and people's need to move around.

I can see that in the dead of winter, bikes may not be a good alternative in NYC, but that's 3-5 months out of year. Today, this morning, we reahed 60F!!! Perfect weather for a bike in the city, provided they give us dedicated bike lanes and other safety measures.

As for the SUVs, don't get me started. $(@^Q#QQ#R(&